Monthly Archive for May, 2010

What have we done to our planet? We must learn from the BP Gulf Oil Spill disaster

As each day goes by, I get more and more concerned about the damage being caused by the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico – the images of destruction that I see reported on the news are amongst the scariest things that I ever seen on the news.

Watch live streaming video from wkrg_oil_spill at livestream.com

Firstly, let’s not forget that 11 men lost their lives in the fire that led to this spill; whilst it is important to consider the economic impact on the USA and beyond, we have to remember that these men died just doing their jobs and the suffering of their families mustn’t be forgotten.

The Horizon off-shore drilling rig exploded on 20 April 2010 and over a month later, thousands of gallons of crude oil are pouring into the Gulf of Mexico with all attempts to stop the leak so far having failed.

This is the worst environmental disaster in American history, and possibly the worst’ in human history and leads to one question – when are we going to take seriously our need to eradicate our dependency on fossil fuels?

Satellite image of the BP Horizon oil spil in the Gulf of Mexico

Satellite image of the BP Horizon oil spil in the Gulf of Mexico

As long as we continue to extract oil from increasingly difficult to reach places, we will sustain the risk of major environmental catastrophes like this.

President Obama was right to ban new drilling around the American coast, but this is must be just the first step in what must be a concerted effort by governments around the world to encourage companies to invest seriously in alternative forms of energy.

Our current reliance on oil leads to inequality and conflict all around the world as we fight for control of dwindling supplies of ‘black gold’. Even without the inevitable ecological disasters that ensue, the continued exploration for oil generates a human cost that we must now consider unacceptable…

As the oil slick threatens hundreds of miles of US coastline, so it should threaten the continuation of oil exploration near human settlements.

It is time for us to get serious about looking at other forms of energy.

When is Merlin coming back?

Come on Auntie Beeb – can we have Merlin Series 3, please?

Now that ’24′ is finished, this would be the only reason for me to switch on my TV!

Interview with Computer Weekly, 18-24 May 2010

I was interviewed by Angelica Mari of Computer Weekly as part of their CW500 Club which is a group of the UK’s top CIOs, CTOs and IT Directors.

I talked about the challenges of managing an IT strategy and function in a dynamic, resource-constrained environment – something not unique to Comic Relief!

Computer Weekly Interview 18 May 2010

Click the picture to read an electronic copy of the full article at the Computer Weekly website.

The ‘Special Relationship’ is back. Hopefully!

The Conservatives are the natural allies of America – our Atlanticism and Eurosceptism always play well in Washington DC, and Prime Minister Cameron’s compassionate conservatism fits well with President Obama’s focus on individual responsibility and social liberalism.

Prime Minister Cameron & President Obama in London April 2009

Labour has traditionally had a difficult relationship with the United States, shunning the world’s largest capitalist economy in favour of its socialist-leaning European neighbours, and Prime Minister Blair was the first Labour leader to break the mould, forging a strong relationship with President Bush Jr.

President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair

His close relationship with George Bush sometimes led to accusations that Blair was acting like a ‘poodle’, demonstrating unswerving loyalty to his friend.

Ultimately, this created a less than healthy situation where America’s actions did not receive full scrutiny and where Britain had no choice but to follow its cousin ‘shoulder-to-shoulder’, which led us into two poorly-planned wars costing thousands of lives.

Blair’s instincts were, however, correct: America is our most important ally; It is his approach that was flawed.

He attempted to build upon Margaret Thatcher’s impressive legacy in which she created the ‘Special Relationship’ through her uniquely close bond with President Ronald Reagan.

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher & President Ronald Reagan dancing (Reuters)

PM Margaret Thatcher dancing with President Ronald Reagan at his Inaugural Ball in the White House following his election in 1984.

Blair mistook the mutual respect and admiration that Thatcher and Reagan had for each other as simple friendship and affection; his relationship with Bush Jr had a similar level of warmth, but not the depth and true objectivity that defined the Thatcher / Reagan era – and shaped world politics for nearly a decade.

Whereas Thatcher and Reagan were trusted confidantes and peers, the way that George Bush called out “Yo, Blair!” to Tony Blair reflected what was obviously a very different level of understanding.

Gordon Brown, as Prime Minister, was simply unable to build any kind of sensible working relationship with President Obama, New Labour’s totalitarian approach sitting much more comfortably with the neo-conservative Republican approach than with Obama’s democratic one.

It is no surprise that President Obama was so quick to congratulate David Cameron on his becoming Prime Minister; the new Conservative administration under dynamic young leadership is exactly the sort of partner that the President needs in Europe; he was quoted as saying of David Cameron:

“…smart, dedicated new prime minister… is somebody we are going to be able to work with very effectively…”

Hopefully, the Special Relationship is back; that will be good for Britain, good for America and good for the world!

Economic Eruptions?

I am writing this blog entry from the Chitorok restaurant in Kiev’s Borispol airport when I should actually be sitting in a meeting in the office back in London.

Why am I here? Volcanic ash, apparently…

YouTube Preview Image

Not for the first time in recent months, events in Iceland are having a ripple effect across Europe and beyond, allowing the country to punch above its weight.
Since last night, winds from the north-west have been carrying volcanic ash from Iceland towards Britain closing many of our airports – including, unfortunately enough for me, airports in London where I was due to arrive early this morning.

Three months ago, if someone had told me that they were pr

edicting that flights across Europe would be delayed due to volcanic ash from a dormant volcano in Iceland I would have laughed at them. The very suggestion would have been ludicrous; like something from a low-budget disaster film.

However, today,  not only is it a a reality, but experts warn that this phenomenon could be with us for some time to come as the last time this volcano erupted, it continued spewing magma and ash for over a year…

Eyjafjallajokull Volcano
The Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland erupting in April 2010

Incidents like these serve to remind us of the power of nature and our relative weakness before it; despite all of our technology and our dependence on flying, there is nothing that we can do to stop or even to avoid the impact of this ash – planes simply have to stay on the ground.

Or do they?

Some observers, such as Sir Richard Branson, believe that the authorities are over-reacting and that they should not be in a position to close the airspace because of the ash, and insist that the airlines should make the choice for themselves and their passengers.

Sir Richard went as far as to describe the decision to close Manchester airspace as “once again beyond a joke”.

Virgin Atlantic jumbo jet in flight

Why is he so angry? At one level, I’m sure that I’m sure that like many good businesspeople he has a natural aversion to Government meddling, but the more serious issue here for the airlines is that of economics.

Every hour of closed airspace means hundreds of grounded flights – not only lost business for the airlines, but potentially huge compensation bills from the affected passengers.

If the worst-case scenario came to fruition and the volcanic ash became a feature of our weather system for another year, the regular closure of airspace across Europe would devastate an already weakened airline industry that is coming out of the worst recession in living memory.

These economic eruptions may be more than the industry can take.

This situation does call into question our reliance on air travel as a primary mode of transport; perhaps this disruption will give us pause for thought, allowing us to consider the alternatives which are often more cost-effective and less damaging to the environment.

I must declare and interest here; I fly more than most and rack-up about 15 return flights a year due to my various business and charitable activities – it is nothing short of hypocrisy for me to be suggesting that people should fly less, but we really must!

This volcanic activity may force us to – although the economic cost may be very, very high indeed.

Britain’s new government hits the ground running!

It really is an incredible day for British politics, as the new Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister demonstrate genuine chemistry and respect for each other in their first press conference.

David Cameron & Nick Clegg - Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister

Britain's new Deputy Prime Minister and Prime Minister sharing a joke in Downing Street

The way in which the potential stumbling blocks in a Conservative / Liberal Democrat coalition have been ironed-out is impressive, and whilst I’m sure that the relationship will be difficult, there is no doubt that these two dynamic leaders are committed to putting Britain back on track and dealing with problems left by a wasteful and misguided Labour administration.

The focus on enhancing civil liberties and once again making an Englishman’s home his castle is most welcome indeed.

Already, we have a clear indication of their priorities as the new Government has already agreed to:

• A Great Repeal Bill, which will scrap ID cards, enhance civil liberties, reduce the ability of state officials to enter homes and cut regulation;

• £6 billion of public spending cuts to take effect in the current financial year, as a start on a concerted drive to cut the deficit;

• Major reform of the banks, perhaps amounting to “breaking them up”;

• Moves over time towards raising the starting threshold for income tax to £10,000 a year, paid for by changes to non-business Capital Gains Tax;

• A pupil premium, moving funding for disadvantaged children towards average spending on pupils in private schools;

• A cap on immigration from outside the EU;

• A referendum on the Alternative Voting electoral system;

• Legislation to require that Parliaments last a fixed term of five years;

• Trident replacement to go ahead, but subject to a value for money test;

• No further transfers of power to the EU, and no entry to the Euro; and

• Tax recognition of marriage, but LDs to have the right to abstain on votes on this (which means it will still get through the Commons).

Although Old Labour will soon resurface to start complaining about the plans, no right thinking person in the UK should object to this initial programme and I hope that even the more tribal observers will put aside their party loyalties and embrace this important agenda in the interests of our country.

David Cameron already has the makings of a fine leader!

David Cameron under the watchful eye of Winston Churchill

David Cameron, Prime Minister

David Cameron is Prime Minister: now the hard work starts!

Today was another historic day in London – Conservative leader, David Cameron, secured his place in history by becoming Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland after securing an agreement with Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, to form a coalition government.

David Cameron & HRH Queen Elizabeth II

David Cameron meets HRH the Queen in Buckingham Palace on May 11 2010

The Conservative Party won the most seats in the General Election, and came close to securing an overall majority in the face of an electoral system that is massively biased towards the Labour Party, but only by securing a deal with the Liberal Democrats could we have achieved power.

The way in which David Cameron has led the party back into power is a clear indication of the impact that he will have as Prime Minister.

This is a great day for the Conservatives, and a great day for Britain!

The Liberal Democrats will make difficult bedfellows, but I have faith the David Cameron’s ability to develop a strong working relationship with Nick Clegg and his team to form a long-term, stable government.

Many congratulations to David Cameron and Samantha Cameron – they are a First Couple that Britain can be proud of.

A Con-Lib pact: Marriage of convenience or a match made in Heaven?

Within the next few hours, there is a strong likelihood that David Cameron will announce that he is able to form a government with the support of the Liberal Democrats, providing us with some stability and certainty after what has been a tumultuous few days in Britain politics.

Conservatives such as myself will be delighted to see David Cameron in Number 10 as our new Prime Minister, although we are obviously upset that we were not able to secure a working majority.

Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg at VE Memorial in London

Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg at VE Memorial in London on May 8 2010

The arithmetic certainly works; together the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats will command 363 seats, representing a comfortable working majority of 37.

However, will the politics work?

The Liberal Democrats are a progressive party that finds itself to the left of Labour on many issues – including critical ones such as immigration and tax. Their position on these two policy areas couldn’t be further from ours, with the LibDems wanting to embrace both illegal immigrants through an amnesty, and higher taxes as part of their plan to redistribute wealth.

On these two issues alone, it is hard to see how the differences in policy could be reconciled sufficiently to allow the parties to work together in government.

But there is an even greater danger – electoral reform. Conservatives have no real appetite for proportional representation (PR) in its many guises, and DC instead favours a reduction in the number of seats to more sensibly reflect the political landscape. Many inner-city areas are divided into several seats in a way that simply doesn’t make sense, and consolidating some of them into a smaller number would go some way to reducing the Labour-bias in the current system and creating a smaller, more efficient parliament.

Nick Clegg will be under enormous pressure from his party to push for PR and if (when!) this is not forthcoming it will lead to disquiet within the Liberal Democrat ranks.

Things will not be easy for DC either; Conservatives will already be smarting from not having secured a majority against the least popular PM in living memory and against a backdrop of economic disaster – this should have been an open goal. The prospect of being in government with the LibDems is not an appealing one – particularly if it hampers the programme of radical changes that we obviously must employ.

The LibDems are against taking immediate action to cut the deficit, whilst at the same time wanting to sustain the highest rate of tax – positions diametrically-opposed to the Conservatives’.

Even if it is possible to sustain some consensus in the short-term, will these odd bedfellows be able to develop a long-term working relationship?

I have enormous faith in our front-bench team, but I greet the creation of a Con-Lib government with some trepidation and I suspect that Labour will be rubbing their hands with glee – they will appoint a new leader, lick their wounds from the opposition benches and regroup waiting for the cracks to appear in the coalition.

One thing is certain – we live in interesting times and Parliament will never be quite the same again!

Houses of Parliament, London

Nick de Bois’s acceptance speech on winning Enfield North

This (rather poor quality) video was made by me on the morning of May 7 2010 as Nick made a most gracious speech following the announcement of his 1,700 majority following a very tough election campaign.

YouTube Preview Image

Well done, Nick!

A great day for him, and for Enfield North…

The bittersweet taste of success…

Friday 7 May 2010 will stay in my mind for a long time to come…

The euphoria that I felt after learning that Nick de Bois had finally removed Joan Ryan to become the member of parliament for Enfield North – and when it was announced that I had been elected as a councillor for Chase ward – soon subsided when I realised that we had lost control of the council to Labour.

Enfield Council Logo

It is many years since Labour has controlled Enfield and it is disturbing to think that the financial mismanagement and class-oriented social policies employed by them previously may soon be returning to Enfield.

Between 1994 and 2002 Labour drove the council’s finances into the ground and quality of local services was incredibly poor.

Since taking control, the Conservatives have built strong finances and improved services sufficiently to earn four-star status. The result of this election puts all of this at risk.

As councillor for Chase ward, I am determined to protect Chase from the worst excesses of a profligate socialist Labour administration in the Civic Centre and will, in particular, be a vigorous protector of our beautiful green spaces.

We know from previous experience that Labour eyes the open spaces of western Enfield with contempt, determined to build as many tower blocks and council estates as possible – something that is just not in the best interests of our residents.

The Conservative group will fight hard in the coming months and years to prevent that happening, and to ensure that Enfield does not become like Haringey – our crime-ridden, one-star neighbour to the south.

Unfortunately, a huge increase in turnout in the east, coupled with a significant voter registration drive by Labour has put the future of Enfield in jeopardy.

As one of the 26 Conservative councillors that will now form the opposition, I will do everything in my power to contain Labour’s excesses, and to prevent them from destroying the great work that was done by the Conservatives under former leader, Michael Rye.